The Alternatives Landscape Fall 2020

Alternatives Research | The Alternatives Landscape Fall 2020

The Alternatives Landscape provides a broad overview of the current environment for the primary alternative asset classes: hedge funds, private equity, private credit, real assets, and real estate.

The first half of 2020 was marked by a return of volatility to the global capital markets as the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic rippled across the globe. Global equity markets experienced the fastest sell-off since the Great Depression and credit spreads widened significantly during the first quarter, but aggressive central bank policy, coupled with optimism that economic indicators had bottomed, fostered a market rally during the second quarter.


Diversifying asset classes, such as alternatives, posted negative results during the first half of the year. Hedge funds protected capital, while commodities and commodity-related investments were significantly negative through June 30. Illiquid strategies, including private equity and private real estate, generated favorable results on an absolute basis and outpaced more liquid peers for the one-year ending March 31, 2020.



Read the full commentary below or down the PDF.

Download PDF


The broad hedge fund universe, as measured by the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index, declined by 3.4% during the first half of 2020. At the strategy level, all four of the core hedge fund strategies protected capital relative to the broad equity market during the COVID-19 related market volatility.


The best performing strategy this year has been macro. This strategy has historically experienced low correlations to both equity and fixed income markets and provides strong diversification during equity and credit market dislocations. The strong performance was driven primarily by discretionary trading strategies where managers construct long and short positions in equities, credit, commodities, and currencies based on macro or thematic views. These strategies benefited from a spike in volatility across various asset classes this year.

While event driven was one of the worst performing strategies, there was significant dispersion between the various strategy types. During the first half of the year, many of the distressed and credit oriented managers took advantage of widening credit spreads by purchasing investment grade and high yield debt. The managers benefited from the Fed’s accommodative response to the crisis, as it announced the purchase of high quality credit and credit spreads subsequently tightened. The distressed credit opportunity set is expected to increase going forward given elevated leveraged loan and high yield downgrade volume.



Total hedge fund assets under management declined by approximately $147 billion during the first half of the year, as total assets were just under $3.2 trillion. The industry has continued to experience modest net outflows since 2018 of which there were a total of $46 billion in the first half of 2020. Overall, the aggregate number of hedge funds has declined since 2014, which is a trend that continued in 2020. According to HFR, the number of funds in the industry peaked at the end of 2014 and has declined by approximately 10% (cumulative) since. This trend is more pronounced in the hedge fund of funds industry, which has declined by over 50% since 2007, but is also evident in the direct hedge fund space, which has declined by approximately 6% since 2015.


After generating solid returns in 2019, private equity markets experienced a more benign decline in performance during the first quarter of 2020 as compared to public market counterparts. This short-term relative outperformance contributed to the now meaningful outperformance for U.S. buyout, U.S. growth equity, and U.S. venture over the past three and five years. Generally speaking, given the illiquidity of its assets, private equity did not see panicked selling that drove declines in some pockets of the public markets. Prior to releasing March 31 valuations, private equity fund managers were able to process information through late April and early May, at which time public equity markets had begun their recovery.



As most of the U.S. went into lockdown in late March, private equity activity slowed considerably and, in some sectors, nearly came to a standstill. Ellwood’s Private Equity Manger Research Team spent the majority of April and May discussing the portfolios of various general partners and gained key insights on defensive measures taken by managers. First and foremost, GPs worked with company management to ensure the health and safety of employees. After this, the focus turned to ensuring the health and safety of balance sheets. To that end, common defensive balance sheet measures included drawing on outstanding revolvers to improve companies’ cash positions, reductions (or eliminations) of short-term marketing/advertising spend, and postponing technology/system upgrades. In many instances, this began early in 2020 as the global supply chain was already experiencing the effects of shutdowns in China.



By July and August, despite virus cases being on the rise in the U.S., private equity investment managers had already begun working with management to pivot to more offensive measures. Add-on acquisitions came through as a key value-add measure, potentially even more so than during a normal market cycle. Many small businesses that were disproportionately impacted by partial shut-downs were more open to an infusion of capital to improve their financial standing. The next steps remain uncertain in many areas of the capital markets, but the outlook for private equity assets in the coming years is at least more positive today than it was just six months ago.


After a strong, if uneventful 2019, credit markets have been anything but dull in 2020. Performance through the first half of the year captured a significant widening of credit spreads following the COVID-19 outbreak in March, and by the subsequent rebound and spread tightening through the second quarter. By the end of June, credit indices had largely recovered from the first quarter drawdown as illiquid markets outperformed more liquid peers on both shorter and longer-term trailing periods.



While the narrative across private credit markets in recent years has been centered on record fundraising levels and elevated debt issuance as investors searched for higher-yielding assets, the story in 2020 has shifted to a mix of opportunistic fervor to take advantage of current dislocations and anticipation of the pending distressed cycle. The COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing recession has left vast swaths of the global economy reeling as entire industries have all but shut down. The combination of evaporating revenues and bloated corporate debt levels has cast a melancholy outlook for a large number of companies. Through the first half of 2020, the number of companies in the Russell 3000 Index with an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA/interest expense of outstanding debt) of less than one, reached an all-time high of almost 600 companies which represents just under 20% of total index constituents. Further, the number of corporate issuers with debt trading at distressed prices – defined as a spread greater than 1,000 basis points versus comparable treasuries – reached a level not seen since 2009. While the number has since subsided, it remains elevated and skepticism persists as to whether underlying fundamentals have actually improved.



After years of robust activity within private lending markets, issuance slowed to a trickle in 2020, as lenders took pause to evaluate the longer-term health of the economy. Middle-market issuance during the second quarter dropped to the lowest level since 2009, by both volume and count. A strong first quarter helped soften the blow to overall 2020 issuance through June.

Unsurprisingly, in the second quarter yields ticked higher across debt markets. While direct lending has historically offered more attractive yields relative to more liquid credits, a spike in broadly syndicated yields challenged the relative value of direct lending. However, this trend is not expected to persist.


Real assets were heavily impacted by the economic slowdown caused by COVID-19; returns within the real assets subsectors were largely negative. Lockdowns caused supply-and-demand shocks felt across the asset class. Decreased oil demand hit the upstream energy sector particularly hard, while real estate investment trusts (REITs) experienced a relatively smaller drawdown in the first half of the year. Cash flow within REITs (measured by funds from operations) fell sharply in the second quarter. Lodging and resorts were most negatively impacted from a cash flow perspective, while infrastructure and data center REITs saw a large increase in cash flow. In an effort to preserve balance sheets, many REITs cut second quarter dividends.



While the pandemic affected the natural resources sector, energy companies were most impacted. Oil prices fell and briefly turned negative for the first time in history. Low oil prices put tremendous pressure on U.S. oil producers, as the domestic cost of production is higher when compared to OPEC member countries. Natural resources bounced back materially in the second quarter, but remain negative for the year.

Midstream master limited partnerships (MLPs) have had a volatile six months and returned –57% in the first quarter and then +50% in the second quarter. An abrupt drop in consumption and production of liquid fuels impacted MLPs. Improving supply and demand fundamentals and a reduction in capital expenditures helped to improve investor sentiment as the year progressed.

Infrastructure has been impacted by the steep decline in travel. Airports are facing a challenging environment as domestic air travel dropped by over 80% compared to June of last year. Utilities faired far better thanks to their inelastic demand characteristics.



Commodities returned -19.4% as all commodity subsectors, apart from precious metals, posted negative returns. COVID-19 caused many plants that process commodities to close, such as lean hogs and cotton, which decreased by 52% and 12%, respectively. Gold has risen over 39% since the end of 2018. The economic climate caused by COVID-19, coupled with inflation fears and Federal Reserve policy all contributed to investors’ increased appetite for gold, which tends to be a safe haven for investors during times of economic uncertainty.





The COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic recession have dramatically changed outcomes for commercial real estate.
As demonstrated in the top chart, income returns have held up during the first six months of 2020, while appreciation turned negative, especially in the second quarter. This led to the slightly negative -0.3% return for the NCREIF Property index.



Total returns for real estate sectors have varied significantly through the first half of 2020. As was the case in recent years, industrial properties held up best year-to-date with a 3.6% return. Conversely, the retail (-5.8%) and hotel (-19.7%) sectors have suffered the most as many parts of the nation remain under safer at home regulations. Both the office sector and the apartment sector produced slightly positive returns year-to-date with income outpacing negative appreciation. Many investors are expressing concerns about the future needs of office space as tenants seem to be functioning well working from home.



As displayed in the third chart, cap rates have continued to decline, indicating that core real estate’s valuations are elevated. Conversely, the Federal Reserve has driven down yields in order to mitigate the effects of the recession. This has kept real estate valuations reasonable relative to 10-Year Treasury yields.



The final chart illustrates the dramatic drop in net operating income (NOI) growth for real estate. The primary drivers in the declines are from the almost complete loss of hotel income and the considerable decrease in retail activity, which was already well underway with the move towards online retail.RENOIGrowth06302020


So far in 2020, real estate values, outside of hotels and to a lesser extent retail, have held up. Lease income for office, industrial and high-end apartments are near normal. Further decreases in valuations are intimately tied to an economic recovery which is dependent on advancement towards a vaccination and medical treatments for COVID-19.

Download PDF

Important Disclosures 

The information provided herein is for informational use only and is not to be construed as investment advice. Any opinions herein reflect our judgment as of this date and are subject to change. In no way should the information herein be construed as personal recommendations as it does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual users.

The information presented is not an offer to buy or sell securities, nor should it be construed as tax or legal advice. The historical information included herein is historical only and is not a guarantee of future performance.

All information contained herein is the confidential and proprietary information of Ellwood or other third parties. Such information may be used only for your purposes and may not be disseminated to third parties without the written consent of Ellwood.

Ellwood obtains information from multiple sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication; Ellwood, however, makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such third party information. Ellwood has no obligation to update, modify or amend this information or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any such information becomes outdated, inaccurate, or incomplete. Included in this report are various indices information. All indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment.

Investments in securities are subject to investment risk, including possible loss of principal. Investments in international securities, even though publicly traded in the U.S., may involve risks which are in addition to those inherent in domestic investments.

Equity investments are more volatile than bonds and subject to greater risks. Small- and mid-cap stocks involve greater risk than large-cap stocks. Bonds are subject to interest rate, price, and credit risks. Generally when interest rates rise, bond prices fall. Investments in commodities may have greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. High-yield fixed income securities are subject to liquidity and credit risk, and tend to be more volatile than investment
grade fixed income.

Alternative investment products, such as hedge funds, private equity, venture capital, private credit, real estates and real assets, are speculative and involve risk. Only investors who understand, and are willing and financially able to assume, the risks of such an investment—including the risk of losing all or substantially all of their investment—should consider investing. Additional risks to consider before investing in alternative investment products include the fact that some products may use leverage that may increase the risk of investment loss, can be illiquid, may involve complex tax structures, and are subject to limited regulatory oversight. For a more detailed discussion of the risks involved with an investment in an alternative investment product, please review the offering materials for the relevant alternative investment product prior to making an investment.

Indices (and associated data) published, administered and/or owned and/or controlled by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, its affiliates, and/or their third party licensors and used in this publication have been licensed for use by J.H. Ellwood & Associates, Inc. Copyright © 2020 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, its affiliates and/or third party licensors. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. For more information on any of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC’s indices please visit S&P® is a registered trademark of S&P Global and Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the ability of any index to accurately represent the asset class or market sector that it purports to represent and neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors shall have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index or the data included therein.

Copyright ©2020 MSCI. Unpublished. All Rights Reserved. This information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-disseminated in any form and may not be used to create any financial instruments or products or any indices. This information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of this information. Neither MSCI, any or its affiliates or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such information or the results to be obtained by the use thereof, and MSCI, its affiliates and each such other person hereby expressly disclaim all warranties (including, without limitation, all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including, without limitation, lost profits) even if notified of, or if it might otherwise have anticipated, the possibility of such damages.

The HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index, HFRI Equity Hedge (Total) Index, HFRI Event-Driven (Total) Index, HFRI ED: Distressed/Restructuring Index, HFRI ED: Merger Arbitrage Index, HFRI Macro (Total) Index, HFRI Relative Value (Total) Index, and the HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index are being used under license from Hedge Fund Research, Inc., which does not approve of or endorse the contents of this report.

Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the Russell Index data contained or reflected in this material and all trademarks and copyrights related thereto. The material may contain confidential information and unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, dissemination or redistribution is strictly prohibited. This is an Ellwood Associates presentation of the data. Russell Investment Group is not responsible for the formatting or configuration of this material or for any inaccuracy in presentation thereof.

Copyright © 2020 PitchBook Data, Inc. All rights reserved. PitchBook Data, Inc. makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding any data it provides, and PitchBook Data, Inc. shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any data so provided, directly or indirectly, by PitchBook Data, Inc.
Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (the Index) is an index comprised of all underlying assets held by public and private business development companies (a “BDC”) that satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Any information presented prior to the Launch Date (September 30, 2015) of the Index is back-tested. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-tested calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the Index was officially launched. Please refer to the methodology paper for the Index (available at www. CliffwaterDirect for more details about the Index. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any performance will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of a hypothetical performance record is that decisions relating to the selection of managers and the allocation of assets among those managers were made with the benefit of hindsight based upon the historical rates of return of the selected trading advisors. Therefore, performance records invariably show positive rates of return. Another inherent limitation of these results is that the allocation decisions reflected in the performance record were not made under actual market conditions and, therefore, cannot completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.

FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2020. FTSE® is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and / or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and / or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent. FTSE does not promote, sponsor nor endorse the research report.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE DATA”), is used with permission. ICE Data, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use, including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE Data, its affiliates or their respective third party providers shall be subject to any damages or liability with respect to the adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an “as is” basis and your use is at y our own risk. ICE Data, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend Ellwood or any of its products or services.

Indexes referenced on page two, chart one: 2020 and Trailing Three Year Performance as of June 30, 2020. HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index; HFRI Equity Hedge (Total) Index; HFRI Event-Driven (Total) Index; HFRI ED: Distressed/Restructuring Index; HFRI ED: Merger Arbitrage Index; HFRI Macro (Total) Index; HFRI Relative Value (Total) Index; HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index.

Indexes referenced on page three, chart one: Market Performance: Cambridge Associates U.S. Buyout Index; Cambridge Associates U.S. Growth Equity Index; Cambridge Associates U.S. Venture Capital Index; Russell 3000® Index.

Indexes referenced on page five, chart one: Major Real Assets Strategy Returns. REITS, MLPs Natural Resources Stocks, Commodities and TIPS are represented by FTSE Nareit All REITs TR, Alerian MLP TR USD, S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD, Bloomberg Commodity TR USD and ICE BofA Merril Lynch 1-5 Year US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, respectively.

Indexes referenced on page five, chart two: Commodity Sector Returns. Industrial Metals are represented by the Bloomberg Industrial Metals Subindex; Precious Metals are represented by the Bloomberg Precious Metals Subindex; Energy is represented by the Bloomberg Energy Subindex; and Agriculture is represented by the Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex.

Published October 2, 2020

Send email Share on LinkedIn Tweet